Pages

Showing posts with label Resource Management. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Resource Management. Show all posts

Friday, October 3, 2014

Past and Present Collide: Maintaining Natural Resources along the Klamath River


I am focusing on the perspective of the tribes who are local to the area. My original research questions were: what are the causes of environmental damage to the river area? How does this damage affect the tribes who rely on the river’s natural resources? What can be done to attempt to reverse the negative effects?  I began with background research into the history of issues, getting the majority of my information from internet resources. The Tribal perspectives I gained from various writings, stories and presentations from Native Peoples.

The Klamath River runs from the Upper Klamath Lake in southwest Oregon, through northern California (Friends of the River). There are four Tribes living in the vicinity of the River: the Klamath, Yurok, Karuk, and Hupa. These groups rely on the natural resources of the river for their subsistence and cultural practices, therefore the degradation of the environment has a direct impact on their ability to maintain their way of life in the present (Klamath Riverkeeper).

The main cause of damage to the Klamath environment can be attributed to PacifiCorp’s hydropower project. This project consists of six dams total; however the removal efforts have been focused around four in particular: the Copco 1 and 2, J.C. Boyle, and Iron Gate developments. The first dam (Copco 1) was completed in 1918, and is a 126 foot high powerhouse dam, with no ladder allowing upstream fish travel, in fact, all but the JC Boyle Dam are lacking upstream passage for fish runs. The final and tallest dam to be installed (Iron Gate) was completed in 1962 and stands 173 feet high. The generating capacity for the four problem dams combined is 145 megawatts (American Rivers). This amounts to 1% of PacifiCorp’s energy demands (Friends of the River).

One of the most prominent effects stemming from the dams is the occurrence of a toxic blue-green species of algae, Microcystis aeruginosa. This algae is native to the Klamath River, however it is not known to flourish in flowing water. The stagnant waters created by the imposing dams create an ideal breeding ground. Microcystis aeruginosa produces a compound that has been known to cause liver failure, and the levels in the Klamath have been measured up to four thousand times what the World Health Organization would consider a moderate risk to human health (Klamath Riverkeeper).

The effects of the algae are not only seen in water quality, but on fish populations as well. There has been a significant decrease in the numbers of Coho Salmon, Chinook Salmon, Bull Trout, and Steelhead just to name a few. Above the Iron Gate Dam, all anadromous salmon and steelhead are extinct (Friends of the River).This affects the culture and subsistence to Native tribes, who in the past exercised great legal control over the way they caught fish, in order to preserve their population numbers and ensure subsistence for all who lived in the river vicinity. Lucy Thompson, a Yurok author documented her story, relaying the use of small, traditional fish dams. She says the downriver people would only take as much salmon as they needed, then remove the dams so that the tribes upriver could catch some as well. The dam laws were highly enforced, so that all people and animal kind could benefit, and they always left enough salmon to spawn the next year (Margolin 52-53). Indigenous cultures share a worldview that is very different from the western perspective. Instead of seeing resources as something that is quickly running out, they understand the earth’s capacity to renew itself. These ideas were once understood by Europeans (for example, the word resource is derived from a French word meaning “to rise again”), but have since been forgotten (Anderson 9).

                There are many other issues other than the PacifiCorp hydropower project that affect the local Tribes. Industrial pollution and agricultural practices introduce chemicals to public lands. Many tribes rely on clean water and non-toxic plants for cultural subsistence, and these natural resources have become tainted (Klamath Riverkeeper). Pesticide spraying is especially threatening to cultures who utilize the plants, as many basket weavers harvest and prepare resources using their mouth (Anderson 319). Placer (hydraulic mining) which began in the gold rush era but is still occurring sporadically disrupts sediment in the river, and washes it downstream. Another big issue has been the suppression of tribal burning. This is the practice of controlled burning in specific, carefully monitored areas, which clears brush and helps to prevent more uncontrollable wildfire (Klamath Riverkeeper). Because this practice has been ended, the forests surrounding Klamath are more subject to wildfire, which bears the risk of a decrease in forest. Less forest means a decline in the availability of traditional foods.

It is not only subsistence for the Tribes that is negatively affected; there are many repercussions to their culture as well. Many Tribes have close ties with their environment, and use many natural resources for traditional clothing, baskets, and housing. Theodora Kroeber’s book The Inland Whale depicts a story as told by Robert Spott, a member of the Yurok Tribe. This story tells of a woman and her would-be daughter-in-law who make use of the natural resources around them. They used salmon and acorns as food, and used grasses to make baskets to hold their excess. They also used bark from trees to make skirts and aprons (Kroeber 21). When access to these resources is threatened, it diminishes the ability to maintain cultural practices, which causes stress on the mind and physique of Native Peoples. They are thrown into a culture of confusion, one that is off balance.

This world out of balance became manifested at the beginning of the fall semester, in an incident where a gray whale found its way upriver and became trapped. This was seen by many natives as an omen, one that had been described in the same Inland Whale story that was recounted by Robert Spott:

To a world in balance, the flat earth’s rise and fall, as it floats on Underneath Ocean, is almost imperceptible, and nothing is disturbed by it. Doctors know that to keep this balance, the people must dance the World Renewal Dances, bringing their feet down strong and hard on the earth. If they are careless about this, it tips up and if it tips more than a very little, there are strange and terrible misplacements. One of the worst of these occurred before Nenem’s grandparents’ time…This was the time when the earth tipped so far that Downriver Ocean came over the bar and flowed up the river, filling and overflowing the canyon, carrying its waters and its fish and other sea life far inland, past even the Center of the World-farther than it had ever penetrated before. With prayers and dancing, balance was eventually restored and the ocean flowed back down the canyon and outside the bar, carrying the fish and other sea life with it, except for a young female whale [Ninawa] who had been washed all the way into Fish Lake and was left stranded there (Kroeber 25).

Although no specific cause of death could be determined, the omen surrounding the death of the gray whale in the Klamath brought the environment to front and center attention.

What can be done to help the Klamath? There are several activist organizations dedicated to reversing the damage, for example the Klamath Riverkeeper, who focus on restoring water quality and fisheries along the river. There has also been a huge movement to undam the Klamath, which thanks to the efforts of such activists and Tribal opposition has been scheduled to occur by the year 2020 (American Rivers). This process however, has a big price tag; 90 million dollars (Friends of the River).

There are also efforts to educate the youth and public about the native perspective of the environment. Ron Reed has been working with department of interior to put together Klamath Basin Youth Employment Education Initiative- traditional knowledge courses taught in western style, based on holistic ecosystem perspective (which is basically If one part of system fails, it affects others); will help spread knowledge on how to sustain these natural resources of the Klamath.


American Rivers: http://www.americanrivers.org/our-work/restoring-rivers/dams/projects/restoring-klamath-river.html

Anderson, Kat. Tending the Wild: Native American Knowledge and the Management of California's Natural Resources. Berkeley: University of California, 2005.

Friends of the River: http://www.friendsoftheriver.org/site/PageServer?pagename=KlamathBackground

Klamath Riverkeeper: http://klamathriver.org/

Kroeber, Theodora. The Inland Whale. Indiana U.P.; M. Paterson, 1959.

Margolin, Malcolm. The Way We Lived: California Indian Stories, Songs & Reminiscences. Berkeley, Ca. Heyday, 1993. Print.

Thursday, November 29, 2012

Tending the Wild: Thoughts after reading Anderson's Text

Native people had many effects, both positive and negative on the landscape of California. One way their practices had a positive effect was on California’s unique biodiversity. Two practices in particular, burning and the passing of traditional ecological knowledge, helped to increase the biodiversity of California.

“Traditional gathering, practiced holistically as both gathering and management, has the potential to promote biodiversity and restore communities to their formerly more heterogeneous conditions” (Anderson 331). One practice that native Californians used was systematic burning of the landscape. They had extensive knowledge of when and where and which plants to burn, and burned in patches (Anderson 331). This pyrodiversity leads to greater biodiversity (Anderson 18). Burning promoted growth of selected species and helped to restore the ecosystem in a way which mimics natural disturbances. Anderson states that “large human disturbances that do not mimic perturbations in nature have the effect of simplifying ecosystems and drastically reducing the lands capacity for self-renewal” (Anderson 9). Native Californians used the rhythms and patterns of extensive observations to develop the best burning strategies.

Another practice that I believe was greatly beneficial to the biodiversity of California is the passing of traditional ecological knowledge. Extensive knowledge of harvesting seasons, frequency and intensity has been passed down through oral tradition (Anderson 332). Things such as taking only what you need, and respecting what the plant is giving to you are concepts that would be beneficial if taught to everyone.


Source: Tending the Wild. Kat Anderson. 2005.

Sunday, October 28, 2012

Grave Matters: Response to Presentation by Tony Platt

Platt began his presentation with a discussion of the skewed perception in the United States (especially California) education system. His example was the California mission project, in which children learn about the use of missionaries as beneficial. His book reveals that what began as an exploration into events in the local area of Big Lagoon “led to an investigation of big issues that resonate in the history of anthropology and archaeology,” and questions specifically the bias of history that has invaded the nation’s history (Platt 4).

Platt describes Big Lagoon as an “unspoiled tourist destination” (Platt 10), and admits that his primary motivation to owning property here in Northern California is that it is a place “to get away to.” Humboldt County is marketed for its natural beauty; the tall elegant redwoods and agate beaches, however this is not how these places actually were. Platt stressed the importance of knowing about the place one resides in, that the common history is usually missing a key element.

One of the primary concepts I correlated with my courses and work is that of collaboration. I have done some volunteer cultural resource management work through the Cultural Resources Facility, and have viewed this collaboration in action. The purpose for these two groups to collaborate is that the primary goal is to protect important sites. Archaeologists always work with a tribal monitor, who is more familiar with their cultures traditional objects than an archaeologist could hope to be. Platt mentioned “socially responsible archaeologists.” In Grave Matters, Platt describes socially responsible anthropology through the words of Dave Fredrickson, who said he taught students of his to “always take notes when Indians speak at digs, be alert to cultural differences, and show respect. Don’t complain, keep your mouth shut, be friendly, and things will eventually happen the way they should. A lot of my success…was due to me listening” (Platt 146-147).

The issue brought up by Platt that is the most controversial for anthropologists is that of repatriation. I agree with him that more of an effort needs to be made in repatriating remains and cultural materials to their rightful people. What is really unfortunate is that even when an effort may be made to repatriate, there is much controversy over whether or not ancestry can (and should) be estimated by remains. I do know of one anthropologist (ironically, from Berkeley), Nancy Scheper-Hughes, who made an apology from the Berkeley anthropology department. The apology was made when they returned Ishi’s (who was taken into the Berkeley museum by Kroeber) brain (which Kroeber had sent to the Smithsonian). An apology seems like not enough to return.

In his conclusion, Platt described four interrelated catastrophes that are responsible for the issues at hand. The first issue is the experience of the Northwestern genocide. Platt suggests that instructors should use this occurrence as a relation when the Nazi Holocaust is taught. Most schools still do not teach about the United States holocausts. Platt’s second catastrophe, the systematic looting of gravesites, is a big issue for me because archaeology is basically systematic looting (the difference being the methodical recordation and analysis). Technology such as ground penetrating radar can be of use, especially in the CRM field, because it can be used to detect sites without destroying sites. The third catastrophe is that most people do not know this history. Here he went back to the example of the education system, but says it goes deeper. American civil religion runs rampant, and makes Americans believe they are innately privileged (my own exaggeration). Finally, the failure of public history to deal with these issues ends Platt’s list of catastrophes. The issue reoccurs over and over where history has been written one sided, and unfortunately many Americans are disconnected from their own historic knowledge.

Tuesday, July 26, 2011

Nancy Patterson Field School 2011

This summer I was able to participate in my first archaeology field school through Cal State Dominguez Hills. We spent 3 weeks in and around Blanding, Utah excavating at the Nancy Patterson Site, and field-tripping to nearby ruins and national parks. Our research was focused on the ancient pueblo inhabitants (referred to by many as “Anasazi”).


The Nancy Patterson Site is located approximately 30 miles from Blanding, and includes the Nancy Patterson Butte and the Nancy Patterson Village below it, as well as nearby Spirit Bird Cave.


Left: Southern view overlooking Nancy Patterson Village from the Butte.







Below: (1)Spirit Bird Cave (Overlooks Nancy Patterson Site);
(2)the "Rock Room" post rock removal






Digging for the first time was really a great experience. I knew it would be a lot of hard grunt work (which it most definitely was-hauling rocks and dirt in the blazing sun), but the excitement that comes from finding the tiniest clue to who lived here made it all feel completely worthwhile. (I highly recommend to anyone considering archaeology as a career, try some field work first-it can be quite demanding physically).



Above:
Erica Digging a test profile in the "Rock Room"







Laura and Anna mending pottery














Laura taking a well deserved break.








We were fortunate enough to have an instructor (Daniel Cutrone) who not only supervised in the site, but also took us on several field trips around the Four Corners Region, to help us better understand the Anasazi as a culture. Our first weekend , we were fortunate to be allowed to view the Hop i Angak'china (Long-Hair) dance. This dance is for the purpose of calling rain to the crops. We were also able to spend some time at the Butler Wash Ballroom Cave ruins.


Left: Our instructor Daniel Cutrone at Three-Kiva Pueblo.







Artifacts from the Nancy Patterson Site can be viewed at the Edge of the Cedars State Park, in Blanding, Utah.